Skip to main content

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

DRAFT — pending professional review

NOT LEGAL OR TAX ADVICE. This module is reference material for the HigherSelf Network cohort. Pending Lumina tone review, outside-CPA review, ERISA-counsel review for any Solo 401(k) or ROBS section, and Grace Fields authorization before external publication. Cohort-facing facts use anonymized framing until written consent is on file.

HigherSelf Network · Knowledge Base Module

Tax Architecture

Per-entity tax architecture for the HigherSelf Network — strategies, statutes, decision tree, and a cohort-facing worked example. NOT LEGAL OR TAX ADVICE.

4 entities12 strategies69 statutes & cases6-step framework

How to use this module

Read the entity that matches the work you do, then the strategies tagged for that entity, then the statutes that anchor those strategies. The decision framework forces a sequence; nothing here is a substitute for a licensed CPA, an ERISA attorney, or state-specific tax counsel.

  1. Identify your entity (or the HigherSelf entity you are transacting with).
  2. Read the strategies available to that entity. Open each for limits, documentation, and statutory anchor.
  3. Cross-reference the statutes & cases that govern the strategy.
  4. Walk the six-step decision framework before implementing anything. If a step fails, stop.
  5. Read the worked example for an end-to-end illustration.
  6. Engage a licensed professional. The disclaimers page lists the gates that must clear before relying on any of this.

Entities

Four operating entities. Each has its own tax profile, default strategies, intercompany role, and constraints.

Strategies

Twelve indexed strategies grouped by category. Each strategy is anchored to a primary statute and listed with its 2026 limits, eligibility, and documentation requirements.

Decision framework

Adapted from the Cohort Tax Architecture playbook. Each step must pass before moving to the next. A failure at any step kills the strategy.

  1. Step 1
    Real business purpose
    Does this transaction or structure exist for a reason OTHER than tax savings?

    Pass criteria:

    • Documented business need (capital, services rendered, product sold)
    • Counterparties would do this with strangers at similar terms
    • Transaction would still happen if tax effects were neutral

    If this fails: Transaction will fail § 7701(o) economic substance — 20% penalty (40% if undisclosed). Strict liability per § 6664(c)(2).

  2. Step 2
    Economic effect
    Does this transaction change the parties' economic position in a meaningful way apart from tax effects?

    Pass criteria:

    • Cash, property, or services actually move
    • Risk is genuinely transferred, not just nominally
    • Parties' net worth differs after the transaction

    If this fails: Sham transaction doctrine (Knetsch). Disregarded for tax purposes; deductions denied; penalties stack.

  3. Step 3
    Right entity / right structure
    Is the chosen entity (sole prop, LLC, S-corp, C-corp, 501(c)(3)) appropriate for the activity, the people, and the goals?

    Pass criteria:

    • Entity matches operating profile (e.g., not C-corp for a single-location bakery without ROBS)
    • Profit volatility matches the entity's tax mechanics
    • Headcount plans match plan-coverage rules

    If this fails: Wrong entity = either over-paying tax (S-corp without QBI eligibility) or hitting an anti-abuse trap (C-corp double tax; ROBS with excluded employees).

  4. Step 4
    Right vehicle for tax-favored growth
    Is the saved/invested money sitting in a vehicle whose tax treatment matches the holder's goals?

    Pass criteria:

    • Solo 401(k) trust for tax-deferred growth (§ 501(a))
    • Roth Solo 401(k) / Roth IRA for tax-free growth (§ 402A / § 408A)
    • HSA for triple-advantage medical savings (§ 223)
    • Brokerage / business accounts only for funds intentionally outside the tax-favored stack

    If this fails: Tax-free in checking is a mirage. Compounding requires the right wrapper.

  5. Step 5
    Watson-reasonable compensation + arm's-length pricing
    Are owner-employee wages reasonable and intercompany transfers priced at arm's length?

    Pass criteria:

    • Reasonable W-2 wage benchmarked (RCReports / BLS OES) before any S-corp distribution
    • Intercompany services priced via Treas. Reg. § 1.482-9 method (CUSP, SCM, Cost-Plus, CPM, Profit Split)
    • Below-market loans priced at AFR (§ 7872)

    If this fails: Reclassification of distributions as wages (Watson); transfer-pricing reallocation (§ 482); imputed interest on below-market loans.

  6. Step 6
    Documentation and disclosure
    Is every step documented contemporaneously, and have any reportable transactions been disclosed?

    Pass criteria:

    • Written agreements, board minutes, promissory notes
    • Substantiation files for accountable-plan reimbursements
    • Day-counts for § 280A(g) rentals
    • Form 8275 / 8275-R disclosure for any uncertain position
    • Reportable / listed transaction disclosure (Form 8886) where applicable

    If this fails: Without disclosure, § 6662(i) escalates the economic-substance penalty to 40%. Without documentation, even legitimate strategies fail on substantiation.

Kill signals — stop immediately

  • The only stated purpose is tax savings. Stop. The transaction will not survive § 7701(o).
  • Money flows in a closed loop with no economic effect. Stop. Sham in substance. Step-transaction doctrine collapses the loop.
  • Payments are labeled 'gifts' between parties with an ongoing business relationship. Stop. Duberstein test fails. Recharacterized as compensation or constructive dividend.
  • Loans without notes, interest, or repayment schedule. Stop. § 7872 imputes interest; sham doctrine recharacterizes principal.
  • Routing fee-for-service through the nonprofit as 'donations'. Stop. Private inurement; § 4958 excess-benefit tax stack; potential loss of exempt status.
  • The structure depends on never being audited to work. Stop. That is not a tax strategy. That is luck.

Statutes & cases

Master citation list across qualified plans, anti-abuse, intercompany, nonprofit, and professional conduct. Verify every cite against current law before relying.

Browse the full statute index

Calculators

Additional calculators (S-corp reasonable comp, § 199A QBI) are scheduled for the next release once outside-CPA review of the modeling assumptions is complete.

Reference

About this module

Tax Architecture

Module of the HigherSelf Knowledge Base

A structured, citation-anchored research module mapping per-entity tax architecture across the HigherSelf Network. Covers retirement access, the five core tax-favored mechanisms, anti-abuse doctrines, intercompany transactions, and a cohort-facing worked example.

NOT LEGAL OR TAX ADVICE. Every artifact is research. Engage a licensed CPA, ERISA attorney, and state tax counsel before implementing any structure. Circular 230 notice applies.

What this module contains#

Structured data (data/)#

  • entities.json — Per-entity tax profile for the four HSN entities (HigherSelf Network LLC, A.M. Consulting, The 7 Space, HigherSelf Nonprofit)
  • strategies.json — Twelve indexed strategies (Solo 401(k), § 72(p) loan, accountable plan, § 280A(g), § 223 HSA, § 199A QBI, S-corp election, § 482 services, § 7872 loans, § 1202 QSBS, ROBS, § 4958 rebuttable presumption)
  • statutes.json — Master citation list across qualified plans, anti-abuse, intercompany, nonprofit, and professional conduct
  • decision-tree.json — Six-step decision framework with kill signals and escalation gates

Research (research/)#

  • worked-example-bakery.md — Anonymized cohort case study (retirement access, entity choice, lawful 12-month plan)
  • five-mechanisms.md — Solo 401(k), accountable plan, § 280A(g), § 223 HSA, § 199A QBI deep dives with 2026 limits
  • anti-abuse-doctrines.md — § 7701(o), sham, substance over form, step transaction, assignment of income, constructive receipt, Watson, constructive dividend, § 4958, criminal exposure, preparer penalties
  • intercompany-transactions.md — § 482, § 7872, Watson, constructive dividend, § 501(c)(3) constraints, HSN intercompany matrix
  • retirement-access.md — Solo 401(k), § 72(p) loan, 72(t) SEPP, Rule of 55, ROBS, comparison matrix
  • do-not-do-this.md — Seven recurring fraud-adjacent schemes with the doctrines that catch each
  • ai-research-pipeline.md — How ML-Intern keeps this module current (cross-link to vault strategy doc)

Documentation (docs/)#

  • glossary.md — Tax-architecture terms used across the module
  • bibliography.md — Primary statutes, key cases, IRS guidance, treasury regs, professional standards, recommended secondary reading
  • disclaimers.md — Circular 230, UPL, draft-status, escalation gates, preparer penalty, privacy

2026 IRS numbers anchored in this module#

Verified via IRS Notice 2025-67:

| Item | 2026 | |---|---| | § 402(g) elective deferral | $24,500 | | Catch-up (50+) | $8,000 | | SECURE 2.0 super-catch-up (60–63) | $11,250 | | § 415(c) total annual additions | $72,000 / $80,000 / $83,250 | | § 401(a)(17) compensation cap | $360,000 |

Status — DRAFT#

Every cohort-facing artifact ships with a DRAFT — pending professional review banner until the following gates clear:

  • Lumina UPL / tone review
  • Outside CPA review
  • ERISA-counsel review (for any 401(k) / ROBS / plan-loan content)
  • Grace Fields authorization
  • Written cohort consent (for any externalized version using real cohort facts or names)

Part of the HigherSelf Knowledge Base#

This is one module within the HigherSelf Knowledge Base. See the top-level README for the full module index.

Grace Fields integration#

This module is managed under the HigherSelf Network with Grace Fields as Master Orchestrator. Content updates flow through the AI research pipeline (see research/ai-research-pipeline.md) with PR-only output and mandatory human review at every gate.


HigherSelf Network — Enriching Holistic Learning. Research only. Not legal or tax advice.